Blast from the Past: Do you Remember Joseph Nemaisa? 5 years later....

By Desmond Nleya

Remember the chilling story of Joseph Nemaisa- the former CID detective who later became a lawyer- the man who reportedly single-handedly gunned down armed robbers at his Chadcombe home in Harare.
The intruders had allegedly taken his family hostage while he was away. But when he returned and discovered the terrifying scene unfolding inside his own house, he acted swiftly. Within moments, the robbers lay dead and his family was rescued.
It sounded like something straight out of a movie- a lone man confronting danger head-on and saving his loved ones.
heraldonline.co.zw/lawyer-shoots-dead-3-armed-robbers/
https://bulawayo24.com/index-id-opinion-sc-columnist-byo-214229.html

Yet five years later, the questions remain.
Who really killed them?
Are private citizens allowed to own an assault rifle such as the Stribog used by Nemaisa?
Does his house have see through curtains, how could he possibly see people in the room whilst he was out side, if the house had curtains?
Were these soldiers armed? If yes, then why did they not return any fire?
Who dragged the bodies from the positions were they died placing them in different settings?
Why did he not notify the police for assistance (by phone) that there was a break-in at his house and he is rushing there?
Would you open fire at armed criminals who are holding captive your family? With all the shooting happening, is it by coincidence that Nemaisa’s family came out without a single scratch?
From the spent cases, were the firearms used licensed and if so under whose name?
Why did the allegedly robbers target his house that attracted such a highly armed gang of criminals?
If he is such a sharpshooter, why is it that the so-called remaining 2 criminals managed to get all the particulars of their dead accomplices, together with firearms, and flee with them.
Why was the other body moved as it clearly shows in the video that it was dragged off from its original position? Logically, one would expect blood stains on the wall if shot while standing. Why therefore blood stains were only on the floor and not on the wall if the robbers were shot while standing?
As an ex-detective and lawyer why did he give The Herald an interview when the case has not been to court? Who is Nemaisa? The public deserved to know. What was his role and relationship with the robbers?